This Season Is Beginning To Look A Lot Like 1998

Who says history does not repeat itself?

Following the discussion I had on 850 the Buzz about the mess found among the teams below UNC and Duke, I realized that this season bears a striking resemblance 1997-98 season. Now obviously the comparison is not perfect but 1998 saw two teams, UNC and Duke, that were well clearly above the other teams in the ACC. Once you got past the 15-501 pair everyone else went about savaging one another like it was Lord of the Flies. Here is what the ACC standings looked like by season’s end.

Teams ACC Overall
Duke 15-1 32-4
UNC 13-3 34-4
Maryland 10-6 21-11
Wake Forest 7-9 16-14
Clemson 7-9 18-14
Ga Tech 6-10 19-14
FSU 6-10 18-14
NC State 5-11 17-15
Virginia 3-13 11-19

At this point in the season it is very easy to see where we could end up with ACC standings that look like these with UNC and Duke possibly only losing one more game apiece(to each other) followed by one other team above .500 in the conference and the rest of the gang sporting losing marks. So what would that mean for the NCAA Tournament? In 1998 five teams found their way to the Big Dance including FSU with their 6-10 ACC mark and ACC Tournament play-in game loss to NCSU. Maryland and Clemson were the other two teams after UNC and Duke who were both #1 seeds. It would not surprise me to see a similar situation this season with the NCAA Selection Committee being forced to take a pair of ACC teams sporting less than stellar overall records along with a .500 ACC mark. And right now it is a longshot to consider both Duke and UNC #1 seeds. That being said, if they lose to each other only leaving Duke 15-1 and UNC 14-2 then UNC beats Duke in the ACC Championship while one among the UCLA/Kansas/Memphis group slips then an argument could be made for both teams being #1 seeds as they were in 1998.

Taking a closer look at UNC’s season in 1998, it also bears some resemblance to this season in terms of how well they did or did not play against certain teams. Much has been made of the loss to Maryland and close games with Georgia Tech and Clemson as signs of weakness during this season. In 1998, the Tar Heels also had issues with unranked teams and lost one game at home in the ACC they should not have lost while playing a couple of non-NCAA Tournament teams past regulation to win. Here are some of teams UNC struggled a bit with:

  • Louisville: defeated 81-72 in Chicago. Louisville ended up 12-20.
  • Virginia: Only beat lowly UVa by eight at home.
  • Georgia: Needed OT to win at Athens versus the Bulldogs who ended up 3rd in the NIT
  • Georgia Tech: Needed double OT to beat the Yellow Jackets in Atlanta. GT ended up 6-10 in the ACC and lost in the 3rd round of the NIT.
  • NC State: Lost to the Wolfpack by 14 in Chapel Hill while ranked #1. Obviously this was a horrendous loss, worse than the loss to Maryland this season.

Now there were plenty of dominating performances mixed in as well including beating then 22nd ranked FSU 103-55. It is interesting to note the 1998 season was replete with tough or close games for a team everyone had picked for the Final Four. Despite these close calls and the rather troubling loss to NCSU at home, UNC still managed to grab the #1 seed in the East with the regional rounds in Greensboro. The reason being is they won the games that really mattered and only actually stumbled badly in the loss to NCSU. The other two regular season miscues were at Maryland and at Duke. In the cases of all three losses, UNC basically canceled them out with subsequent wins over all three teams in the ACC Tournament. In the end UNC weathered some tough games and when March rolled around the Heels were playing at a high level.

Just some food for thought concerning the ACC as a whole and this version of UNC.

Quick Note: As Ed points out in the comments section, the Final Four this season and in 1998 was in San Antonio. Also the East Regional will go through North Carolina as it did then too only this season it will be in Charlotte instead of Greensboro. UNC also had the national POY that year in Antawn Jamison, something that Tyler Hansbrough could win this season also.

10 Responses to This Season Is Beginning To Look A Lot Like 1998

  1. If Ty Lawson kisses center court in San Antonio, I’m blaming you, THF. 😉

  2. Chapel HILL Bill says:

    Just found this site and am very excited by the quality of comments I see. Thanks for doing this – a great thing for all Heel fans.

    Can you refresh my memory – what did our roster look like in 1998?

    Still think we’ll finish better than Duke but if not, the future is certainly very bright as far as you can see.

  3. Tar Heel Fan says:

    IIRC the starters were:

    Ed Cota PG
    Shammond Williams SG
    Vince Carter F
    Ademola Okulaja F
    Antawn Jamison F

    Mahktar Ndiaye was pretty much the only key reserve that season. Other guys who saw playing time were Brian Bersticker, Max Owen and Brendan Haywood.

  4. Mike White says:

    If I recall correctly, Ndiaye was in the starting lineup instead of Okulaja for many games, including the final four loss to Utah.

    It isn’t 1998 unless we beat Duke by 30.

  5. Chuckheel says:

    How quickly you guys are forgetting. 1998 was the year of the infamous alternating by alphabet starting lineup that Bill Guthridge employed. It came to bite us in the rear against Utah in the Final Four, because it happened to be Shammond’s game not to start. We needed a hot Shammond and ended up getting the cold version just like 1997 against Arizona.

  6. Tar Heel Fan says:

    Shammond Williams was 3-25 in two Final Four games.

  7. […] Gasaway goes on to write that he thinks Duke is the favorite next week in the Dean Dome. Anyone else feeling nervous? 10 years ago things were the same? […]

  8. […] This Season Is Beginning To Look A Lot Like 1998 addthis_url = ‘’; addthis_title = ‘This+Season+Is+Beginning+To+Look+A+Lot+Like+1998’; addthis_pub = ”; […]

  9. CarolinaGirl says:

    The only major difference I can think of is that compared to 1998, our bench is huge. But in reality, depth is at least a little bit of a problem this season and this team is relying on 2-3 very talented players to carry it, much like 1998. Easy Ed was also a sophomore just like Ty, so that’s another good comparison. I hadn’t really thought about everything you wrote because I had always thought of the 1998 team as dominant and the 1997 team as the one who struggled against weaker opponents. Thanks for the insight, as always!

  10. william says:

    We needed a miracle to win that Georgia game back in 97-98.

    I had forgotten how small that team was, so maybe there is hope for this current team which has no starters above 6’9″.

    On the other hand, Carolina is huge compared to Duke. I honestly do not believe that Duke matches up well with Carolina, unlike Maryland and Clemson, both of which played big. Carolina was far better than Duke in 1998 and I see it pretty much the same way this year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: