ACC Now: Will UNC Be Better When Lawson Returns?

Interesting hypothesis from J.P. Gilgio at the N&O

Much has been written about how the Heels will be better when (if?) Lawson returns because Thomas has been playing so well in his stead.

The problem with this logic is it assumes Thomas can produce the same at 10- or, at best, 15-minute intervals as he can at 25- to 35-minute ones. One major reason Thomas has been playing so well is because he’s playing consistent minutes for the first time in his college career (it’s also the first time he has warranted those minutes).

It’s easier to do your job when you know your role and you know the minutes will be there. Ask Brandon Costner or Ben McCauley. When you start subbing in and try to produce in 5-minute or three-possession spurts, you often do too much to try stay on the court and in turn do the opposite. Again, ask Costner and McCauley.

Thomas has been exactly what UNC needed in Lawson’s absence because that’s how Roy Williams’ system is structured to function. Thomas is not going to suddenly morph into Vinnie “The Microwave” Johnson when Lawson returns and generate instant offense off the bench.

That means UNC is better prepared to handle injuries than most programs but it doesn’t make them a better team if (when?) Lawson returns.

First of all, Giglio is usually spot on with his analysis but I disagree with him here(yeah real shocker, I know)

The basic premise is that once Thomas returns to spot duty at 10-15 minutes per game, his effectiveness will recede because his role will somehow be less defined.  He cites the diminished play of Brandon Costner and Ben McCauley at NCSU as examples of guys who had their roles changed/reduced by another player and how they no longer knew what to do.  Now the first place you want to go looking at that analogy is looking at QT’s attitude which, at least where Costner is concerned, is miles ahead.  McCauley is a good kid and plays smart basketball.  However, I do not think that is what Giglio is getting at and he says as much in response to some comments.

I’m not comparing Thomas to Costner and McCauley in terms of attitude but their respective situations.

Last season, Costner and McCauley were two of the most productive players in the ACC as starters. They knew what was expected and they had the minutes (not that the coach had no other choice).

Hickson changed McC and Costner’s minutes and roles. Lawson’s return will do the same for Thomas.

The mistake everyone else is making is that UNC will automatically be better when Lawson returns because they’ll have both Lawson and Thomas.

My point is Thomas won’t be in the same role, or mode, when Lawson returns.

I would counter Giglio here by pointing out that in the NCSU situation Costner and McCauley are not only sharing minutes with J.J. Hickson but they also have to be on the court with him at the same time.  Some of the disruption to their production is their place in the offensive pecking order has changed and they find themselves having to play at different spots on the court because Hickson is occupying the middle.  I also think the lack of ACC caliber PG play is part and parcel to their lack of productivity.  If the Wolfpack had a good to great PG, he could find a way to involve everyone in the offense and the productivity for McCauley and Costner would go up in my opinion.  From my perspective this is an apples and oranges comparison simply because what NCSU needs more/different things from Costner/McCauley than UNC is asking of QT.

In UNC’s case QT is being asked to come in, run the offense and take care of the ball with just a tinge of point scoring.  This seems to be a less complicated role for a player who specializes at that spot versus what Costner and McCauley from whom more versatility is required.  When QT comes in for Lawson, he comes in to play PG and understands his role, even more so now that he has done it for five games almost full time.  Granted, the “mode” will change and QT needs to adjust to coming off the bench for shorter periods and adjust more quickly but I am not sure that will be an issue.  The two major problems QT had for three years was lack of confidence and experience.  He has gotten both of those now and it is amazing to me to watch how the offense morphed from looking disjointed versus Duke to almost like it does when Lawson is in versus Virginia Tech.   Also, unlike the Pack players, Lawson and QT will likely never be on the floor at the same time which further reduces any confusion that might interfere with productivity.

The improvement in UNC as a team comes from the reduction of the gap between Lawson and Thomas at PG.  Before the injury, bringing QT in was an absolute crapshoot(see at Clemson.)  The offense fell to pieces, the fast break was non-existent and UNC was generally lost with QT turning the ball over more than anything else.  Most of those issues seems to have been resolved during this stretch of games with QT at the helm.  In my mind, when Lawson returns and QT enters the game, the chances UNC will miss a beat on offense is severely reduced.

I am convinced that QT is nothing but a character guy.  We know this because he is still wearing a Tar Heel uniform despite being relegated to third on the depth chart in favor of younger players, one of whom, Bobby Frasor, was not even a true PG out of high school.  His attitude and maturity tells me he can adjust to being the backup again and still operate at much the same level as he is doing now when he plays only 10-15 minutes a game.  I would even go as far as to say QT would give Frasor a serious run for the #2 PG spot were the junior guard healthy, though I think Frasor’s defense tips the scales in that battle.  The difference between Lawson and QT is that with Lawson Pomeroy had UNC as a top three offense.  With QT the offense is “merely” in the top 10.  That is the gap you are looking at between the two and to me there is no question it is an improvement over the way it was prior to the Lawson injury.

Advertisements

11 Responses to ACC Now: Will UNC Be Better When Lawson Returns?

  1. C. Michael says:

    Here’s the thing: come tourney time, because of the 3 minute TV T.O.’s it becomes much easier for Lawson to play 35 minutes a game. And UNC with 35 minutes of Lawson is still much better than UNC with 35 minutes of QT.

  2. Tar Heel Fan says:

    That was not the issue. I don’t think he is saying UNC is not better with Lawson versus QT. He is dealing with the theory that people say UNC will be better with QT backing up Lawson. His point is QT will not be as good as he is right now because of the role change. I disagree and believe the dropoff between the two had been reduced which is an improvement in my mind.

  3. C. Michael says:

    Oh, yeah I agree with that completely. My point was more to the fact that in some ways, it is moot. If QT is continues to play well, which I think he will, then UNC is obviously better off, but if he doesn’t, then it won’t really matter, b/c it will be all Lawson, all the time.

  4. Tar Heel Fan says:

    True. But foul trouble could dictate otherwise and it is nice to have quality backup in QT not only for that but also so UNC can function close to normal even when Lawson takes a break.

  5. MinnyTarHeelFan says:

    Michael – I agree, but you have to wonder how the ankle would hold up trying to play 35 minutes. From experience, I can tell you that ankle won’t be back to full strength until May or June.

    THF – I see Gilgio’s point and yours. I think QT will be as effective, but I think what Gilgio is saying is that he won’t be as productive. I think this is especially true in scoring. QT tends to pick his spots to score, and they are few and far between. If he’s on the court for smaller amount of time (say 2-3 minute spurts) I don’t think he’ll look to score as much and will focus his energy on running the offense and playing good D.

    It’s an interesting problem to have and not one we thought we’d have back in November.

  6. william says:

    I think you are right, THF. While the phenomenon he mentions does exist at times, in Q’s case his issues have always seemed to be injury and confidence-related, not role related.

  7. kavita says:

    This is off topic but can someone tell me what Roy and Coach K were fighting about during the 2000 NCAA game when Roy was at Kansas? It’s been mentioned in the stories about their current spat.

  8. Tar Heel Fan says:

    I found this from the CNN/SI recap:

    The previous NCAA Tournament clashes between the teams make up only part of the animosity between the coaches. Roy Williams, who was born in Spruce Pine, played and coached at North Carolina, the Blue Devils’ archrival.

    Williams and Krzyzewski exchanged heated words midway through the first half, but the rest of the contest was filled with huge momentum swings and big plays.

    “I love Roy Williams,” said Krzyzewski. “He and I are great friends. This wasn’t about me and Roy Williams. This was about the way the game was being called. I think he was trying to protect his turf and I was trying to protect mine.”

  9. robuck says:

    another point that Mr. Giglio failed to mention is the rest of the Heels adjusting to Q’s style. Many players have mentioned the past couple of weeks about adjusting to how Q runs the point versus how Ty plays the position. I believe that now, when (if) Ty comes back, when he subs out for Q, the team will be much more conscious and ready for Q’s style, meaning less of a disruption to the offense.

  10. Tar Heel alum and fan says:

    Another factor is Roy Williams’ confidence in Q, which now has to be considerably higher since Lawson’s injury. Whereas before Williams might have leaned toward keeping Lawson in longer than he might have wished, now he can with much more confidence spell a tired Lawson, who as MinnyTarHeelFan notes may take a long time to be able to play a full 35 minutes when he returns. And during the grind of the ACC and NCAA tournaments that might be the difference between a long run and going home.

  11. william says:

    Carolina beat State by 14, after leading by 20. How many would they have won by if Lawson had played?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: